This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Print Page | Contact Us | Report Abuse | Sign In | Join Us
News & Press: News

Study: Mental Health Apps Are Loaded With Scientific Language, But Light On Scientific Evidence

11 April 2019   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Heather Smith
Share |

uncaptioned image

Apps claiming to effectively diagnose and manage mental health disorders are multiplying and their audience is growing, but does the science really support their claims?

Findings from a new study in Nature Digital Medicine suggest that users should be cautious. Not only do few of the apps rely on real-world experience in their design, argues the study, most also lack any credible scientific evidence to support their claims.

Researchers identified 1,435 mental health apps from the two most popular app stores (iTunes and Google Play), and then focused on 73 of the apps “representing the most highly ranked” to evaluate their claims. The claims pertain to common mental health disorders, including depression, anxiety and substance abuse, and a few less common, notably schizophrenia. Nearly 65% of the apps claim to effectively diagnose conditions, improve symptoms or mood, or foster self-management.

The study found that “scientific language” was used by 44% of the apps to support their claims, although these claims included “techniques not validated by literature searches.”  In fact, only one app included a citation to published scientific literature. So while there is plenty of science speak in the apps’ descriptions, “high-quality evidence is not commonly described,” according to the study.

A minority of the apps (14%) included a description of “design or development involving lived experience,” suggesting that the majority did not include real-world experience as part of their development—or at minimum it wasn’t mentioned in their descriptions.

Other techniques used to promote the apps included “wisdom of the crowd” appeals (32% of the apps), in which reference is made to the collective wisdom of people choosing to use the app (i.e. anecdotal user reviews), rather than scientific evidence. 


Article Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddisalvo/2019/03/31/study-mental-health-apps-are-loaded-with-scientific-language-but-light-on-real-science/?ss=healthcare#504e7774e3cd